No, this is not a regression because of bug #89269. I checked by reverting the changes (removed the extra '*'s from power.sh). Additionally, power.sh would have set the apm level to 1 or 255, not 128.
Attached is the udevmonitor log for a suspend/resume cycle. It looks like there was no add event for sda, that would explain why the rule wasn't executed. (I don't really know the /devices/... nomenclatura, but there is none of the words sda, scsi, block, sd, hd) ** Attachment added: "udevmonitor.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14086475/udevmonitor.log -- [Hardy] hdparm.conf settings are lost on suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
