As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to the "restricted" component wouldn't be a good solution.
Ubuntu already installs packages from "restricted" by default, so where would be the harm if Firefox was one of them? The regular user wouldn't even know about it and doing so would resolve this bug pretty easily. It's a win-win situation, in my opinion. I would like to add that I am a dedicated Firefox user (after all, it introduced my to free software) and I was pleased when the official logo was used in Edgy (or was it Feisty?) -- that means I'm fine with it being non-free but this doesn't stop this bug from being perfectly valid. -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
