most sincere apologies, I had no clue but I do understand. Not to be making a big issue, but I do not consider a small minor revision change to be hi-jacking. Its these kinds of comments that turns off new linux users from reporting bugs. The more correct way of handling minor kernel change issues would be to explain why this was the wrong place to confirm that there was a missing dependacy for this package. honesly, I'm not really sure why such a small revision change would break vbox ? it does not break video drivers when the change is so minor, I'm asking why it would in one package and not another ? again, I'm not TRYing to hijack this bug, I'm just not sure how I was supposed to know there was a better bug to report to....
-- virtualbox cannot initiate due to vboxdrv missing from kernel modules [x86/hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
