OK, requirements for songbird getting into ubuntu:
1. build and use system xulrunner
-> note it doesn't have to work perfect; as long as it builds and is usable
to some degree it should be ok; patches that are initially missing can be
sorted later
2. trademark/license issues: songbird should come up with a general exception
that delegates the quality assurance to ubuntu; we have our own QA and that
should be enough. Additional reviews of patches are fine, as long as dispute
about them doesn't lead to revocation of distribution rights. If we are not
100% confident, we can also start to distribute this using white-labelled
marks. However, i'd say songbird developers that care for the quality should
rather contribute during development cycle so that the package we distribute is
in line with their quality expectations by the end of the cycle. Preferably a
songbird dev would join the mozillateam as a liasion. To get this started join
#ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net permanently.
--
[needs-packaging] Songbird
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
