On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:15:07PM -0000, Nick Bauermeister wrote: > As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to > the "restricted" component wouldn't be a good solution. > > Ubuntu already installs packages from "restricted" by default, so where would > be the harm if Firefox was one of them? > The regular user wouldn't even know about it and doing so would resolve this > bug pretty easily. > It's a win-win situation, in my opinion. > > > I would like to add that I am a dedicated Firefox user (after all, it > introduced my to free software) and I was pleased when the official logo was > used in Edgy (or was it Feisty?) -- that means I'm fine with it being > non-free but this doesn't stop this bug from being perfectly valid. >
Anyone willing to put work into providing a real free firefox and forking out artwork branding to a separate package is invited to jump in #ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net and help to get this sorted. - Alexander -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
