On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45 PM, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The more i think about this the more i am against adding browsers to the > deps, only because if they are using non-gecko browser they will have to > install one.(yes i know thats the point as mozilla-mplyer wont work on > konq, ect...) since most people using Ubuntu or Xubuntu has a gecko > browser installed already this sould not be a dep. Please move them to > recommends as this will cause too much cruft to be installed if they are > using a minimal system without Ubuntu-desktop but with Gnome-* package.
I think it's reasonable to add all supported browsers as mozilla-mplayer dependency. If the user doesn't have supported browser installed, what's the point of mozilla-mplayer on his system? > When you say brower-package you mean a empty package that depends on a > browser? (empty == meta package) just sued to get deps. I'm thinking on any browser that can make use of mozilla-mplayer. But, as I said before, that situation is very rare. There are not that many browsers out there, which would be added, so the previous example is not that important. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
