We are cheating here, true, we say "sh" when it's really "bash". But I don't think it's a real problem, so I tend to close the upstream bug with WONTFIX. It's similar to highlighting TRUE and FALSE in C code - these aren't standard identifiers, yet they are common enough and we highlight them. "Simple fix" above is not acceptable, there must be a language with id "sh". "Extended fix" is possible but wrong. If there is sh.lang, then it will be used for all sh-like scripts, including bash scripts (at least with our advanced unix technologies). All in all, it's a small issue without a small fix.
-- 'sh' syntax highlighting actually for bash, and uses syntax invalid for Bourne shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
