I'd like to test the new package also, but I only have a 64-bit install so the i386 wouldn't work for me, I don't think.
cameo73 wrote: > The combination libflashsupport + nswrapper-conn2 + flash 9 is indeed > the most stable one (for me). I think the current (perceived) > instability of Firefox/Flash (note that most people wouldn't know the > difference) in Hardy is a real problem. I wouldn't be surprised that > this has been a dealbreaker for people trying Ubuntu. > > Note to Robert Persson: nswrapper is originally meant to run x86 plugins > in x64 environments. But it also has the benefit of 'sandboxing' > plugins, so they don't crash the browser in case of a seg fault in the > plugin. That's why the (I presume slightly modified) Conn version works: > it doesn't fix the real issue, but it provides a nice workaround (i.e. > limiting the crash effects -- and now negating them entirely). > > I personally hope this workaround will soon be released; especially > since the currently available versions are (very) unstable. > > -- firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
