libc6-dev is in build-essential, so no buildd will ever be without it. That said, Steve's suggestion still looks pretty darned hideous to me, and it's likely better either for Ubuntu to just be carrying a small build-dep diff for now, or for us to evaluate the value of moving dietlibc to main.
(Note also that the "dietlibc-dev | libc6-dev" build-dep would never do what you want in Debian since, as mentioned, libc6-dev is already installed on all the buildds) As a side note, I could very easily implement [derivative] and [!derivative] support in sbuild, but while it would work in Ubuntu, getting it accepted (and, more painfully, rolled out to every buildd) in Debian might be tougher. :/ -- FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
