You are correct. (of course) The instance started was an m2.4xlarge...which is why it ended up costing slightly more than I was expecting.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Scott Moser <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Simon de boer wrote: > > > Umm....Is there some reason the 10.04 wouldn't work on the cluster > compute > > instances? > > How exactly did you do this ? > I know for fact that Ubuntu has no registered images of 'hvm' type (which > is required to run on a cluster-compute node). > > It is my understanding that in order for to run our kernels on hvm, we > will need to enable pv-on-hvm drivers which we do not currently have > enabled. I admit I've never actually tried. > > Can you give info on what ami you ran that was ubuntu on type cc1.4xlarge. > > I'm guessing you've confused cluster-compute nodes with high memory > nodes (m2.4xlarge or m2.2xlarge). [1]. I just checked, and there are no > *public* images that have a name matching 'ubuntu' that are type 'hvm' > > [1] http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ > -- Become the head coach with InGamer Sports! http://www.InGamer.com/ Simon de Boer 519-400-4774
-- Ubuntu-cloud mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-cloud
