Le mercredi 28 décembre 2005 à 18:12 +0100, Jon Gurrutxaga a écrit : > Hello!
Hi, > one in red colour. I suggest this change because the hibernate option > causes a "heavier" response of the system than the sleep one. > Furthermore, this way the blue color could be used for the "log out" > icon better than the green one. Blue or green is quite the same for that no? Does it make a real difference to switch both? > 2. I'd prefer (if possible) to use a window without titlebar (just a > thin border, like mentioned before in the thread). We could have a > "Log off" (or whatever) item in the menu to call this window and > forget about the title, using separators and headers to group the > options. If you prefer a such window, do you want some fadding effect on the background too? The current version is a normal window, you can switch it, move it, etc. Without the titlebar it would be a fixed position... > 3. Thinking on how the options are related (and on left to right > priority) this could be a possible layout: > _____Shut down options_____________________ > Shut down Restart > _____Power save options____________________ > Sleep Hibernate > _____Session management options____________ > Log Out Switch user Save session (may be not a good idea, but > could feet here) I agree that the 3/3 distinction is not ideal. The 3 categories kind of make sense, maybe we should give a try to know what it looks like > But I suggest this layout as my favorite one: > _____Power save options______________________________________ > Shut down Restart Sleep Hibernate > _____Session management options______________________________________ > Log Out Switch user Save session (may be not a good idea, but > could feet here) 4 and 2 is kind of weird. If we do that we should maybe use one icon for sleep/hibernate and make the difference using a modifier like windows do > Best wishes for the 2006, Thanks, you too! -- Sebastien Bacher -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
