Sandis Neilands wrote:
And now some random thoughts after wandering at remixcommons.org
Again, thanks for triaging this :) I've given the Reading Remix stuff a careful listen. And from the list you posted I'm left with 2 contenders. Taking something from Reading Remix has an added plus of supporting a project that is already trying to do similar things to us, so everything else being equal I'd like to take stuff from there..

My list:

Miracle Lemon - Cool. The intro pulls you in from the beginning. The recording quality could possibly be better, ie the instruments could be crisper, but it's not bad. There is also an option to fade it out cleany at 2.37 if we are squeezed for disk space.

maachhi-mara - Very interesting. Different, yet with universal apeal, IMO. The only criticism might be a bit repetitive (can we fade it out earlier? ...)

I'm happy for these two to go in as our semi-final selection and then possibly add a classical track if we can find one that is imediately appealing, short and high quality.

------

There are several tracks I would have liked to include if we had room for 10. I have no very good reson for excluding them other than the fact that a choice must be made.


Alan Simon Ross Jam - Esp. the second session is quite cool. The string instrument sounds a bit off-tune though. I'm sure that's just a non-western scale, but it will sound off to many people.

Levi - Not bad. Perhaps not as good a melody/song as Miracle Lemon, but better sound IMO.

6021 - I like it, has a festival feel to it. But perhaps not the most catchy? A bit long and experimental.


------------
Unsuitable IMO:

"E" - I liked it personally, I'm just not sure it will be suitable. The drug-taking lyrics may well get us in trouble, regardless of what the underlying message of the song actually is. (remember the picture controversy)

Cuedos - the intro is a bit far out; we may loose people in the first 5 seconds, which might be all we get. Otherwise quite good.

Leadbelly - a classic to be sure, but it may be totally lost on some. Also not so good for showing playback quality.

Drunken etc. - Too experimental to be useful for us I think.

Oslo - ditto. Makes your speakers sound broken, exactly.

While We Walk - very crisp sound. There is something I don't quite like though, perhaps his voice.

tiredeyes - I agree that it compares well with some electronica, but it does also get boring after a while.


General comments:

We are balancing many considerations here. We will likely be quite constrained by disc space and may only get to put one or two songs on in the end (reducing this content means increasing the number of languages the CD can support for example. -- We will also have a readme HTML file about the content though where we can put additional links. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperExampleContent/ReadMe )

As a result, people will judge us on that one or two pieces. Anything too heavy, too boring, too culturally narrow will then be problematic. People who pick up the CD won't know or care about the process behind selecting the tracks, but may judge the whole Ubuntu project by it.

So, causing offence is the first point to cover, and secondly not to sound too extreme in any one direction. Punk and Rachmaninov are probably both out on these grounds.

Something non-western is a good idea, esp. if it's quite listenable in itself. Ubuntu has often been characterised as an African project because of it's name and the nationality of its founder, but really it is a global project. Selecting a traditional African piece this first time when we are including music might be supporting that misconception at this point. I think Nepalese music would be perfect in this regard though.

- Henrik

--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

Reply via email to