On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: > ship > fspot in place of gthumb. > > Advantages: > 1. Fspot has some nice features, like flickr integration, timelining and tags Has anyone done a feature for feature comparison? > 2. Fspot is actively developed, gthumb is dead Almost, some fixes and features turned up in the last cycle. > 3. Fspot is likely to become part of gnome (although not by the edgy > cycle, as the author has not proposed it So why not wait?
> Disadvantages: > 1. Fspot brings in mono, with all that that implies. Mostly it is a space > issue > 2. Data migration from gthumb currently does not exist (although Larry > Ewing, author of Fspot has said he has a patch and that should be in a > stable version during the edgy cycle) But surely that'll be childs play to do, if some one wants to /can do it. > Thoughts? 1. Let the gnome crew make the call 2. Get it into the repos, so people can try it. Duncan -- Linux user: 372812 | GPG key ID: 21A8C63A | http://lithgow-schmidt.dk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
