On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:55:13PM -0700, Jono Bacon wrote: > On 10/03/2009 11:39 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > >You know, in these cases the current +filebug is destroying information > >we need. If the bug reporter already knows at time of filing that it is > >a 'translation', 'wishlist', 'usability', 'packaging', etc. issue, then > >this is extremely valuable information as to how to handle the bug. > > > >There are specific teams with interest in each of these classes of bugs, > >who do not regularly troll through individual packages bug listings but > >who might be able to handle these issues directly if they were tagged as > >such. > > > >Currently, this info is not captured at time of bug filing, so someone > >else has to think and tag it later. This adds unnecessary delay and > >increases the workload on the triager. > > > This sounds like great feedback, Bryce. What do you feel is the best > solution?
I'm imagining a set of radio buttons on the +filebug page, which apply the given tag to the bug on submit. I'm sure there's more than one way to do it though. Bryce -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
