On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 15:33, Andrew SB <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Danny Piccirillo > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:50, Alin-Andrei <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As far as I know, Solang was even removed from Debian due to it being highly >>> unstable. >> >> I don't believe it was removed, but simply wasn't packaged in time? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547506 >
I see, thanks. I've dented this to debarshiray (main Solang dev) and will report back. On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 15:42, Ricflomag <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 20/05/2010 20:19, Danny Piccirillo a écrit : >>> - depending on tracker is a blocker, we had tracker activated by default >>> in previous ubuntu version but had to stop doing that due to the impact >>> it's having on system performances and io load. We will likely look at >>> the new tracker and evaluate it but we don't have ressources to spend on >>> it for lucid since it's not on our priority list. We do plan to get it >>> uptodate and working in universe though >>> >> Yes this is a legitimate concern. When was tracker last included in >> the default install and what version was it at? >> > > Tracker was removed before Hardy's release (see bug #132741). If I do > remember correctly, one of its main problems was because of this good > old kernel bug: "Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness" (#131094). > So it is probably difficult to fix tracker without fixing this > 3-years-old kernel bug first :[ Thanks, here's the link to that bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309 There's so much there it's impossible to sort through. -- .danny ☮♥Ⓐ - http://www.google.com/profiles/danny.piccirillo Every (in)decision matters. -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
