Dnia 2011-01-31, pon o godzinie 21:11 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen pisze: > I'm in favor of removing hibernate for the reasons Rick expressed. > > ma, 2011-01-31 kello 11:04 -0800, Rick Spencer kirjoitti: > > However, Hibernate works well for some users, so this will be a > > painful > > regression[1]. > > Hibernate works well on my computer, however the speed of starting from > zero, loading grub, loading kernel, loading saved memory state and > showing the desktop etc (the hibernate does) is almost the exactly same > as doing a normal startup, so the hibernate mode is quite useless. > > The work done on upstart and other boot time improvements has made > hibernate obsolete. Thanks!
I'm using hibernation on my 2 machines and it works fine. On one of them, restoring from hibernation is even *slower* than clean boot (lots of RAM). But - nobody can measure my time of opening all my applications again, with specific ones, which cannot be saved to restore as it was. That's why i'm using hibernation: I don't need to care about all my documents, games, web pages, terminal sessions. If I will loose that long login session with weeks of uptime, I will be really confused. I can't imagine at the moment to work totally without saving my session using hibernation. Regards -- Piotr Drozdek <[email protected]> -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
