Le lundi 18 avril 2011 à 15:05 +0100, Chris Coulson a écrit : > I see a lot of people are recommending Epiphany. I've used this before, > but it's never been my default browser. I used it again today, for the > first time in a year or so. Here's a brief summary of some of the things > I noticed: > > - Text rendering is pretty bad. For some reason, text appears to be tiny > in Epiphany compared with any other browser (or any other application on > my desktop for that matter). This is easily visible by comparing > something like http://www.bbc.co.uk/news side-by-side in Firefox and > Epiphany. > > - It has a very wasteful statusbar by default. Ok, I know you can turn > this off - but when I did this and then hovered over some links on the > page, I got a tiny overlay in the bottom-left hand corner displaying the > destination URL in the same barely-readable font that the rest of the > page is in (I had to squint so I could read it). These font sizes don't > seem to match anything else on my system. I'm not arguing Ubuntu should use Epiphany by default at all, but for a fair comparison you should really use 3.0 instead of the one-year-old 2.30 which is still shipped in Natty. There have been many changes in the UI and in WebKit. Notably, the status bar is gone. Here's a screenshot from Wikipedia (agreed, you don't see much): http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Epiphany3.0.png
Cheers -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
