Maximal features should not be our goal. What's best for the default
install should be.
There are always going to be other file managers a user can install
from the USC for more features. We should pick a path that is best in
terms of maintainability for us and usability for across-the-chasm
users.
Picking one of the forks of 3.4 nautilus means that either we are the
sole stewards or we will conflict with the existing maintainers over
design goals (which sounds a lot like GNOME but with less manpower).
I don't think we have the energies to own a whole file manager. I vote
we just ride along with GNOME on this one and patch it to fit better
when running under Unity.
-mt
On Thu 09 Aug 2012 10:52:28 EDT, Jonas Platte wrote:
I think so too. The only good feature in 3.6, that I can find, is the
black icon set for the left panel.
Am 09.08.2012, 16:49 Uhr, schrieb Georgi Karavasilev
<[email protected]>:
To be honest, there is so much work to be done in nautilus 3.6 that I
find
it hard to believe if it is even a choice here -_-
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
