Agreed. Been looking at the build failures on arm to see if anything stands out - looking to setup some pis to build it locally. If anyone else has a good ARM setup and looking for something to troubleshoot, look at both the stable firefox and firefox beta/nightly as they appear to fail with different errors.
Had a good discussion on IRC about it: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/07/17/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t14:42 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Marcos Alano <[email protected]> wrote: > I think armhf is important until release Ubuntu Desktop for arm64 to run on > Raspberry Pi 3. > > My 2 cents. > > > On 7/10/17 6:28 PM, Bryan Quigley wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> It's been discussed a few times on IRC how Firefox gets stuck in >> -proposed in dev releases because it doesn't compile for all the archs >> on every Firefox release. This also occurs for those same archs on >> updates - for example the most up-to-date Firefox release for ppc64el >> Xenial is 52. >> >> Can we drop Firefox building for some of the archs so that it's not >> blocked on them? What archs do we really care about having Firefox on? >> >> Currently building:amd64, arm64, i386 >> Currently failing: armhf, ppc64el, armhf >> >> Thoughts? >> Bryan >> >> * Latest build fails related to rust on ppc64el. Check out rmadison >> firefox for more (I believe it is accurate) >> > -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
