(Please don't kill me for intervening in this thread. :-) ) Vincenzo Ciancia a écrit : > I expected anything out of this thread, but people defending the idea > that keeping /usr/local/lib in the library path during system upgrades > is a good idea. I can accept to have problems *after* the upgrade, but > not to be left with an unusable system just because I had stuff in > /usr/local and that's my fault. > Maybe there's no reason to fight over that, but I think this can be a good idea. Are there any drawbacks of temporarily removing /usr/lib from lib path before upgrading? In any case, this can help to make the process work as expected by the developers.
I had recently such an experience with old GNUnet libs in /usr/local that blocked it; not a big deal, but disabling them would have allowed my update to go flawlessly. Many may be frightened by apt inconsistency errors. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
