On 7/7/08, Evan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would propose a compromise between the current LTS pattern and the > proposed bug-fix only pattern: maintain the current upstream merge, but add > no new packages. That way newer software is still in the repositories (and > thus supported upstream for the longest time possible), but the more > intrepid changes (ex: pulseaudio) are dropped. Users get a system that is > still up-to-date, and developers get much more time to fix bugs. > > Decisions would have to be made on an individual basis for packages that are > officially discontinued upstream in favour of newer implementations.
This sounds like my second suggestion, I think we are on the same page here. LTS needs more attention to stability than is giving to STS. > Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ceteris paribus, regressions should have a higher priority than normal bugs. I totally agree. -- Luke L. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
