On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:18:29 +0200 Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Il giorno sab, 04/10/2008 alle 09.00 -0400, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: >> >> If it's an essential piece of functionality for you, then you should >> stay with Hardy. > >I personally have solved the problem using hardy's couple of required >packages - I will see if I can add hardy repositories with a lower >priority. The problem is as follows: > >ubuntu is growing in the academia, however people currently using >windows and miktex will not switch if they don't have inverse searches, >and they will obviously want to use the latest release. > >So to solve bug #1 we should compare features to what is available on >windows and in this case the regression is making ubuntu lose points.
It was decided early in the development cycle that we didn't have the resources to deliver both a KDE 3 and KDE 4 desktop with Intrepid. Given the amount of effort currently going into making KDE3 to KDE4 upgrades smooth and doing KDE 4 bugfixing, I think it was the only way we could have gone. I understand your frustration. There just isn't a good answer that will satisfy everyone for Intrepid. If we'd stayed with KDE 3 (as Debian is doing for Lenny), I think even more people would have been unhappy. Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
