On Saturday 21 February 2009 4:15:37 am Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > Colin Watson ha scritto: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:25:09PM +0100, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > >> On 19/02/2009 (``-_-??) -- BUGabundo wrote: > >>> Both 2 an 3 are known, just jump on #ubuntu+1 and someone will hand > >>> you the LP bug ids. > >>> about the 1st, its the 1st time I ear about it, but not many using > >>> Ext4 yet, due to lack of support of GUI tools. > >> For the first problem I found a bug report identical to mine, I added to > >> it the ubiquity debug log. By now it completely blocks jaunty installation. > > > > In future please file a new bug rather than doing that. It makes our > > lives much more difficult when people tag along to an existing ubiquity > > bug; it's actually quite difficult for users to tell whether they're > > experiencing the same cause of problem as somebody else. > > > > I don't think I am getting the point: usually when I find my bug already > reported I add information to it. In this case the bug I found is my bug > so why should I open a new bug? Is this just a policy for ubiquity?
Sometimes there are multiple bugs with similar symptoms. And sometimes the hardware has a similar model name but is very different. -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
