On Monday 20 April 2009 4:27:42 pm richard wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:07:23 -0400 > Mackenzie Morgan <maco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:59:46 pm richard wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400 > > > Mackenzie Morgan <maco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richard wrote: > > > > > so I checked the software sources > > > > > > > > > > ALL the sources are now jaunty i386 > > > > > > > > > > This is not a i386 machine and all the sources were amd64 before > > > > > > > > How do you determine that? sources.list says nothing about the > > > > architecture. > > > > > > > I'd have cut N pasted , but you cant on that. > > > apt-get update should not be pulling down debian sid lists. > > > > It wouldn't do that unless you added sid to your sources.list on your > > own. > > > I definitely did not add sid to the source list, this is why I'm really > p****d off over this. > > I've checked though all the files in /ect/apt/ and I can find no > reference to sid anywhere.
Did you grep or recursive grep? What about the files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/? -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
