On Friday 12 June 2009 9:02:51 pm Remco wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Mackenzie Morgan<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday 12 June 2009 3:05:14 pm Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > >> Heya > >> > >> This reminds me of per-user installed deb's (not supported) vs global > >> install's which clog up every users. For one in Ubuntu we have e.g. > >> plugins OOo in the repo. But if you install them there is no option > >> for unpriviledged users to disable it =/ it's just gray in OO.o > > > > I don't believe that's the case with Mozilla applications. If you install a > > Firefox extension from the package manager right now, it is still possible for > > a user to disable it within their own local Firefox while still keeping it > > installed system-wide. > > You mention something that the Patrick seems to miss: Ubuntu already > has packages in the repositories for Firefox. This could be done for > many other programs too (and probably has been for some). But, that > would put a LOT of strain on packagers. Firefox alone has thousands of > extensions, managed by Mozilla.
Well at least for just the dictionaries, it seems they should be packaged. Those are rather important. -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
