"Remco" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:53, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Once again: those are bugs. Let's just focus on solving the problem in the >> existing kernel instead of adding another one. >> >> It's more difficult to segregate the non-free material so it can be provided >> via the restricted repository for those that want it than it is just to rip >> it all out, but that's the way to support both freedom of software and >> freedom of choice. >> > >Agreed. My lingering question is, does this bug actually exist? I was >under the impression that all the non-free parts were already removed >when the "free-only" option was selected. > That is the intent. It wouldn't surprise me to find out the current situation is imperfect and could be improved. I'm not qualified to say. Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
