Hi Lionel (2010.08.15_17:48:56_+0200) > AFAIK (and according to LP), it wasn't autosynced but instead > reintroduced manually by a developer using syncpackage
I sponsored that (using syncpackage). And yes it had to go through NEW again. Was there someone else I should have asked? > I wasn't really happy about libstdc++ returning to maverick I've had users on my back about the removal of libstdc++5, so when I saw this (and it didn't look too evil) I sponsored it. We don't poorly packaged proprietary software, but our users still want to run it... SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
