On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:29:35PM +0200, Tom H wrote: > 1) How does the unit now what "%f" is?
See the "SPECIFIERS" section of the systemd.unit(5) manual page. > 2) "%i" is, in the case that I set up a few weeks ago, > "sys-devices-pci0000:00-0000:00:0d.0-ata4-host3-target3:0:0-3:0:0:0-block-sdb-sdb1". > Should it have "sdb" in it since it's supposed to be an unstable name? There doesn't seem any particular reason for the various %i.device units that this particular service is bound to to need stable names. The purpose of systemd-fsck@.service is just to run fsck on all your block devices; it doesn't much matter what they're called. Jobs that need to run on only particular block devices would typically be udev rules rather than systemd units, I think; but if need be a systemd unit could always use udevadm to inspect the udev database for information about a particular device. (There may be some better way.) -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
