Please stop. "Lawyering" on this list is pointless and will not get us anywhere. "I think this would be compliant" and "I think this would not be compliant" is meaningless when coming from a bunch of random engineers.
Give Canonical some credit. They're not going to go ahead with something that they think will violate the GDPR, since that would obviously be bad for Canonical, bad for Ubuntu, and bad for everyone else. As a project, for legal matters, we defer to Canonical's legal staff to make a final determination, because we have to make *a single determination* in order to proceed with anything. This is the only reasonable way to proceed. I'm sure someone will disagree with any determination, because someone always does. Law is subjective like that. But arguing on this list about it is pointless. Leave it to the implementors to check with Canonical legal and make sure that the final implementation will be in compliance. The minutiae of compliance is not a matter for this list. If you think the whole principle would not be in compliance, then either they'll agree with you and it won't happen, or they'll disagree with you and it will happen. Whichever way, arguments amongst engineers on this list from a legal perpsective will not make the slightest bit of difference. Let's leave the legal stuff to the legal people, and focus on the technical stuff here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss