Tollef Fog Heen [2010-11-14 22:20 +0100]: > ]] Martin Pitt > This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a): > > a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices > stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. > > Has anybody looked into that or given that any thought?
Our legal department has checked GPL, MPL, Apache, Artistic, and a few other common licenses, and said that it was okay to ship binaries without changelogs (at all -- and now we at least ship the topmost bits of it). Above clause doesn't apply to binaries, but to the source code apparently. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
