On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:38 -0600, Ted Gould wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:16 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:04:55PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote: > > > Have we gotten any kind of feedback on the similar changes that were > > > made to strace? > > > > Not a peep that I'm aware of. I am assuming that the verbose errors out > > of strace, ltrace, and gdb were enough to address it, though maybe there > > won't be noise until the restriction is in an LTS version. > > Well, I find it annoying, but a reasonable default. Perhaps we could > have a package "insecure-developer-workstation" that would set all of > these little debugging nicities back to "1" on startup? That way I > wouldn't have to keep up on all of them :) > > I'd even have it install the first time you install a "-dev" package, > but that might be a little extreme.
No please. :) I may only have a very small handful of -dev packages installed at any given time since I do most of my actual dev work in a clean schroot. I would encourage everyone to do this where it makes sense for them, since then you are guaranteed to have only what is needed and nothing floating around from previous releases/manual installs/etc. -- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
