On 01/31/2011 11:51 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, January 31, 2011 02:40:36 pm Bryce Harrington wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:04:22AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote: >>> Natty is currently NOT showing the Hibernate option in the list of >>> shutdown choices. This is currently an experiment, but I thought it >>> might be worth discussing the pros and cons on these lists as well. >>> >>> So, thoughts, discussion, feedback, options, suggestions, rants, raves, >>> etc... ? >> >> I used to use hibernate a lot, even though it was slow like mentioned in >> the original email, it was a nice way to save state. Handy when on >> airplanes. >> >> But I agree it's so painfully slow and unreliable to be unusable in its >> present state. Hiding the option in the menu and declaring it >> officially unsupported (but making it configurable and still callable >> from pm-utils and so on, just no bug reports) seems like a good >> approach. > > I use it somewhat regularly, mostly when flying. I agree it's slow, but > except when there's insufficient swap I'd had no problems with it. When > there's insufficient swap it just fails so suspend and brings me back to my > desktop. > > I understand that it's been disabled in the kernel, so we'd have to get that > fixed (my preference) before we could go with your plan. > > Scott K >
Shouldn't we be detecting when there's insufficient swap / disk space and then hiding it then? -Scott Ritchie -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
