On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Loïc Minier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > Do we have something similar to debian-private in Ubuntu? >> God forbid :p > > Eh; yet it would still be "less private" than the subset of people who > made the decision, while not being entirely public. > > Such a permanent list would have potential for abuse though, and its > mere existence would cause people to wonder how much is being discussed > on it.
To be honest, it's really not that bad of an idea. Some things tend to "snowball" when they are on public lists, it would almost be nice to have a list that's not council-only (we do have private lists already, this would actually move some council talk into the members-only lists) to talk about issues that might be "hot-button" in the blag-o-sphere. IMHO, we'd not be taking public discussion private, rather taking private discussion to a more public list. As long as we state this policy somewhere, we can point to the wondering few about the "double-secret-probation list" to the wiki page. > > -- > Loïc Minier > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > ubuntu-private would be really nice, IMHO. -Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
