I was recently looking at some aptdaemon bug reports and noticed that there are surprising number of duplicates. Upon further investigation I noticed that quite a lot were reported after Natty was officially released and apport was disabled. I then queried for all bugs opened since 2011-05-01 which are tagged apport-crash and natty with the following results:
aptdaemon: 243 compiz: 6 telepathy-butterfly: 4 evolution: 4 ... After evolution there is a long list of packages with less than 4 bug reports, which is what I'd expect (lots of packages with low numbers of apport-crash reports) since few people would have apport enabled. However, I'm baffled as to why aptdaemon is receiving so many apport-crash reports post release. Looking in the aptdaemon code I found a crash reporting routine (aptdaemon/crash.py) which seems to be an apport package hook for aptdaemon but doesn't start the apport service. I've also looked at some of the aptdaemon apport-crash bug reports with the most duplicates for common attributes (are they upgrades? are they fresh installs?) and haven't found anything. Does anybody have an idea as to why there are so many aptdaemon crash reports coming in? Thanks! -- Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
