Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Jun 03, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:18:34 AM Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> On Jun 03, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> >I'm not sure how complete the current draft is relative to the >planned >>> >content coverage but so far it lacks a lot of information that was >in the >>> >old wiki pages that I found useful when trying to use IDD. >>> >>> I might be misunderstanding, but do you mean some information that >was in >>> the UDD wiki pages didn't make it into the UPG? I thought I was >pretty >>> careful about making sure everything got transferred over. It's >possible >>> that the information is organized differently (and maybe not >optimally), >>> but please do let me know if you think any of the fundamental >information >>> didn't make it over. >> >>I didn't find the what to do after you upload bits since the current >stuff is >>oriented towards new users. I may have just missed the relevant topic >though. > >Yep, I think so, but to be fair, it's probably not very well organized >for >experienced users. > >http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-uploading.html > >Essentially you just need to: > >$ bzr mark-uploaded >$ bzr push ubuntu:package (sometimes just `parent:` will work) Right. Mostly what I need are docs that are easy enough to find the next time it comes up because I'm old and forgetful. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
