Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 10:01 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > On 10/26/2011 04:22 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 03:07 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: > >> On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > >>> Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: > >>>> On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: > >>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 > >>>>> Build OK - synced from Debian testing. > >>>> > >>>> Until we can sponsor syncs through the LP API [1], and as long as > >>>> there's not an immediate need for the sync, we should probably just > >>>> subscribe ubuntu-archive, unsubcribe ubuntu-sponsors, and set to > >>>> Confirmed once a sync is validated so that the requester can get > >> proper > >>>> credit for it. > >>> > >>> You can use sponsor-patch in oneiric, which does this job for you. > >> > >> I thought sponsor-patch was for patches/merges, we're talking about > >> syncs here. > > > > It supports to sponsor syncs, too. > > > > One tool to rule them all. ;) > > It's probably a somewhat archaic view, but that's not a very Unix like > approach to the problem. If I was going to work on syncing a package, > I'd expect the tool for syncing packages to be the one I wanted to use ...
sponsor-patch is for sponsoring bugs, regardless if the bug is a sync request, merge request, debdiff, merge proposal, or normal diff. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
