On 11/14/2011 08:43 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote: >>> I'll propose a compromise: how about we remove REVU from the >>> documentation for new packagers, so we're not pointing people there >>> first anymore. The MOTU/core-dev who are still using REVU for package >>> reviews can keep using it, they'll just tell their mentorees to go there. >> >> It's not a compromise at all. I think it's the correct solution. >> >> Existence of a tool doesn't create expectations, it the documentation >> around it. Update that and problem solved. > > I personally don't object to people still using it for their own > purposes, even if PPAs (I know they suffer from the same-version problem > mentioned earlier), VCSes and other tools do a similar job. > > If that's the general concensus, maybe we should also add a piece of > text on REVU itself? The other pages I know that would need updating > would be https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU and > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages > > Any others?
It seems like we've reached a good conclusion. I'll leave this standing for another week for any further comments, and then will start working on editing the documentation. Thanks all for the good discussion, Allison -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
