Sebastien Bacher <[email protected]> wrote:
>Le 25/02/2012 17:15, Ubuntu Installer a écrit : >> Rejected: >> Rejected by archive administrator. >> >> gnome-control-center (1:3.3.90-0ubuntu3) precise; urgency=low >> >> * debian/patches/62_update_translations_template.patch: >> - update POTFILES.in with the ubuntu specific sources for >translation >> >Hey, > >Dunno who rejected that upload so comment on the list, is there an >issue >to accept several versions at once? What happened there is that >somebody >else uploaded a new revision while mine was in the queue, so I guess >whoever dealt with those accepted the new one and rejected the previous > >one, which is fine but: > >- the change I did was never advertised on -changes (which means people > >who use the list to track what is changing get confused) >- if there is any bug that should have been closed with that upload if >wouldn't have been closed >- the uploader gets a rejection mail with explanation which is >confusing > >We could say that uploaders should check the unapproved queue before >uploading a new revision of something in the queue and use -v, but >wouldn't it be simpler to just accept both versions and let launchpad busy and >deal with the builds? I think that was me. IIRC the buildd's were busy and it seemed wasteful. The lower revision would probably end up failed to upload. While I don't know of specific bugs, I think inviting Soyuz to get in a race with itself is generally not prudent. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
