On 04/03/2012 10:12 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: >> aisleriot (i386, amd64, armhf): >> libical (i386, armhf): > These two are in progress in the desktop team ATM. > >> heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): >> Needs to move to single <glib.h> includes rather than <glib/*.h>. > Actually, we'll fix our "revert single include requirement" patch > harder in glib2.0, to also avoid this kind of FTBFS in universe. This > will fix some 20 FTBFS. > > Martin > Won't reverting the single header include just cause other glib related include failures for moving headers? I guess it might possibly be less than the current number though.
Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
