I think this is a brilliant idea. I think that "keep ISOs buildable" would have a wonderful impact on everyone's velocity and quality.
Cheers, Rick On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]>wrote: > I won't be at UDS, so if this is of interest to someone, I would really > like > it if someone who is would take the ball and run with it. > > Currently build sequence on the buildds is determined (primarily) by a > combination of pocket and component: > > https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/BuildScores > > In my opinion, one of the major reasons to prioritize builds is to help > keep > ISOs buildable. During non-freeze periods it is not at all rare for > flavors > built out of Universe to go days without a successful image build on some > architectures due to archive skew. > > I think we should change the scoring model in Launchpad (yes, this would > be an > LP change, but I think it should be driven by Ubuntu) to include a > seeded/unseeded element as well. This would give us more images available > for > testing on a regular basis without having to get special respins. > > This could either be done by dropping the current component based score > changes and substituting a seeded/unseeded differential or by adding an > additional score differential for seeded-in-ubuntu packages on top of the > existing model. > > Scott K > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel >
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
