Hi Colin, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > There remains some question about what to do with future LTS cycles. > Depending on the progress of work on running our own equivalent of > Debian's testing migration (which I seriously hope will be complete by > T, given that it's currently scheduled for quantal!), it's quite > possible that we'll reach the point where syncing from testing merely > introduces an extra source of delay and risk, rather than being a useful > protection. However, I don't think we can answer that question until we > have some practical experience with running our own migration scripts.
To date I'm only aware that we've discussed using testing migration scripts to ensure archive installability; our reasons for pulling from testing for the LTS have generally had more to do with the other main aspect of testing, namely the filtering out of release-critical bugs. Do you foresee us doing that kind of RC bug tracking as part of -proposed migration? If not - and I hope not ;) - I think it will still to our advantage to track testing for the RC bug gauntlet aspect. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
