This week I uploaded a new pyyaml revision to Debian which, among other things, now regenerates cython generated code as part of the build process.
For Debian, I think this is clearly the right thing to do, because the only way to make sure the source and binary that are shipped are compatible is to actually regenerate the generated code. For Ubuntu, I'm not so sure because cython is in Universe (thus this message). There are two options as I see it: 1. Promote cython to Main. 2. Revert the changes to regenerate the source and use upstream generated source in the binary. I'd prefer option #1 as it keeps pyyaml in sync between Debian and Ubuntu and is technically the more correct option, but I don't know if Canonical is up for cython in Main? Scott K ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main Date: Saturday, June 09, 2012, 11:42:53 AM From: process-component-mismatches-diff <[email protected]> To: [email protected] The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: o cython: cython cython-dbg [Reverse-Build-Depends: pyyaml (MAIN)] o python-support: python-support [Reverse-Depends: cython] Please see http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component- mismatches.txt for the full report. Please contact https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive for problems with this notification. -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release ----------------------------------------- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
