On 20 September 2012 11:23, Colin Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > Some time ago we generated a new signing key (4096R/C0B21F32) for the > Ubuntu archive, since the previous one was generated in 2004 and was > starting to look a bit elderly. I added this to the ubuntu-keyring > package some time ago, and have now arranged for quantal and newer > releases to be signed using both the old and new keys. After some > transitional period we will switch to signing only with the new key. > > I hope very much that nobody will notice this change unless they go > looking for it, because if they do then I've probably done it wrong. :-) > I'll keep an eye on things today to make sure. > > -- > Colin Watson [[email protected]] >
Hi, Naughtily upgrading via, sed -i 's/precise/quantal/g' /etc/apt/sources.list apt-get update: ... Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal-updates/universe Translation-en Reading package lists... Done W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32 It did leave me scratching my head momentarily, until I remembered this thread. I haven't checked, but presumably it is signed with both keys.. An apt isn't content with knowing one of the signatures is valid. Is the key, (or if my suggestion is correct - a fix for apt) going to be SRU'd? Kind Regards, Dave Walker -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
