Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2012, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > > but.... a generic approach might be: > > > > "~ubuntu-next-series-sponsors" which is subscribed to bugs & asked to > > review branch proposals, with a mass > > s/ubuntu-next-series-sponsors/ubuntu-sponsors/ are archive opening. > > As I said above, I think I'd prefer to unsubscribe and use a tag, but > maybe there are disadvantages I didn't think of. > > This is a very useful discussion and I hope it'll help us keep the queue > more manageable.
I have a simpler idea: * Let the contributor know that the patch is not suitable for the current release period. * Milestone the bug to 'later-r' [1] Then the sponsor-queue script needs to be modified: It needs to check the bug for 'later-*' tags and only show the bug on the queue once the release is open. It could addition add a separate table with deferred bugs. [1] The tag need to contain the release. Instead of a tag, a milestone could be used. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
