On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:05:46PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Perhaps we could just do this once semi-manually during the cycle > then? I'm sure there are other i386 packages that don't install on > amd64 for one reason or another.
There are thousands of i386 packages that don't install on amd64 for one reason or another. This makes any attempt to report on the affected packages useless, because there are only a handful of packages that we actually *expect* to be installable and care about when they aren't. It may be reasonable to report on a whitelist of those packages that we care about, but this shouldn't live in the main britney instance because britney is critical-path for updates to the development pocket. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
