On Friday, March 01, 2013 12:36:43 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, March 01, 2013 06:16:18 AM Martin Pitt wrote: > > Scott Kitterman [2013-02-28 18:24 -0500]: > > > Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give > > > 12.10 users a decent interval to upgrade. > > > > +1 on that from me as well, unless it turns out in discussions that we > > are doing 13.04 after all, and only drop 13.10. > > No would be a good time to be discussing this change for after 14.04. Doing > this mid LTS - LTS cycle is going to be problematic for a variety of > reasons. If we had a year to get ready, then we might be in a reasonable > place to decide on making a transition like this. > > I think this is a substantially more complex (in terms of understanding all > the implications, making sure they are thought through, and including things > in the "plan" - not necessarily just in code) than the "No more source > packages" spec or the archive reorganization spec. How long have those > taken? > > Scott K
s/No/Now at the start of the first paragraph. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
