On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0000, Victor Palau wrote: > On 28/02/13 23:07, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I think this would be a valid solution; one thing to keep in mind with > > this approach that security updates would be built based on some version > > of the rolling release and so users of older versions of the packages > > would be forced to update to anything pulled by these security updates. > > This sounds like a validation nightmare.
Realistically, any validation approach based on a rolling release (or a thin layer over it) would surely end up simply quoting a manifest of package versions that were validated. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
