On 11 July 2013 08:43, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It seems so strange to spend six months saying "don't touch that" just
> > to turn around and then spend nine months begging people to touch that...
>
> I know it can be confusing, but the $devel-proposed (that should be future
> proof) serves a completely different purpose than -proposed post-release.
> Once
> Saucy is released, saucy-proposed will serve the same purpose -proposed has
> always served. "Not for humans" only applies to the development phase.
>
>
It looks like the two different uses of -proposed should be separated, no?
So a $devel release would have an always empty $devel-proposed and all that
is currently pushed there would go to $devel-autobuilder-only-proposed or
something and a released verison would continue as-is.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:[email protected]
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) |
| : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
| `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting |
| `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
