Hi Martin, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > == foundations == > saucy-adt-pandas (regression)
It looks like Dmitry Shachnev has fixed this up already - thanks, Dmitry! Beyond that, this is a package in universe which I don't think Foundations should be responsible for fixing the test suite in. I think either this should be owned by MOTU, like other aspects of universe are, or we should not run / not block on autopkgtests for unseeded packages. > saucy-adt-apt-clone (regression) > saucy-adt-eglibc (rebuild test FTBFS) > saucy-adt-lintian (regression) > saucy-adt-python2.7 (never worked on amd64, ok on i386) > saucy-adt-python3.3 (never worked on amd64, ok on i386) > saucy-adt-ubuntu-release-upgrader (regression) I'll make sure these get taken care of. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
