On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > >I made a first stab at documenting the proposed-migration workflow > >(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration). > > I didn't understand the last sentence here: > > "Furthermore, the Ubuntu process has no arbitrary delays and no consideration > of release-critical bugs, so there is very little benefit to users in using > -proposed and such use is strongly discouraged. Packages should normally be > built against -proposed." > > Is this a recommendation or statement of fact? IOW, while we shouldn't be > using -proposed, we should build packages (e.g. local test builds) against > -proposed. Or does it mean that the system itself builds packages against > -proposed?
It's meant as both. I've rephrased to make that more explicit. How does https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3 look? Thanks, -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
